<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text-Only Ads are the Most Effective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2010/05/19/text-only-ads-are-the-most-effective/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2010/05/19/text-only-ads-are-the-most-effective/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2010/05/19/text-only-ads-are-the-most-effective/comment-page-1/#comment-3125</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=5372#comment-3125</guid>
		<description>This is a good point (and the answer to your first question is &lt;em&gt;No&lt;/em&gt;), but are we looking at two different things, I wonder?

Putting aside for a moment the inherent limitation of choosing an optimal advertising medium from a &lt;em&gt;usability&lt;/em&gt; viewpoint, this is dealing with embedded advertising on the predominantly text-based Internet*.

In this case we&#039;re looking at views (rather than impressions), click through rates and, finally, sales as a measure of effectiveness. It seems fair in this case and a good way to quantify an advert&#039;s success.

However the wonderfully unquantifiable &lt;em&gt;brand awareness&lt;/em&gt; is completely lost in advertising like this (unless minimalist, text-only advertising &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; your brand&#039;s image), and brand awareness is absolutely priceless.

The only adverts I can recall immediately are huge, visual, bold and controversial. They are emotive and they&#039;re fantastic. I may not have clicked on them, bought anything because of them or even discussed them with anyone: but I sure remember them… and the brand behind them.

*For &#039;predominantly text-based&#039; read blogs or the majority of corporate websites that don&#039;t &lt;em&gt;get it&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good point (and the answer to your first question is <em>No</em>), but are we looking at two different things, I wonder?</p>
<p>Putting aside for a moment the inherent limitation of choosing an optimal advertising medium from a <em>usability</em> viewpoint, this is dealing with embedded advertising on the predominantly text-based Internet*.</p>
<p>In this case we’re looking at views (rather than impressions), click through rates and, finally, sales as a measure of effectiveness. It seems fair in this case and a good way to quantify an advert’s success.</p>
<p>However the wonderfully unquantifiable <em>brand awareness</em> is completely lost in advertising like this (unless minimalist, text-only advertising <em>is</em> your brand’s image), and brand awareness is absolutely priceless.</p>
<p>The only adverts I can recall immediately are huge, visual, bold and controversial. They are emotive and they’re fantastic. I may not have clicked on them, bought anything because of them or even discussed them with anyone: but I sure remember them… and the brand behind them.</p>
<p>*For ‘predominantly text-based’ read blogs or the majority of corporate websites that don’t <em>get it</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2010/05/19/text-only-ads-are-the-most-effective/comment-page-1/#comment-3122</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=5372#comment-3122</guid>
		<description>But has a text only ad ever stuck with you? Could you tell me two or three of your favorites?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But has a text only ad ever stuck with you? Could you tell me two or three of your favorites?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

