<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Hiring Talent (Not Just Programmers)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/12/31/on-hiring-talent-not-just-programmers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/12/31/on-hiring-talent-not-just-programmers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/12/31/on-hiring-talent-not-just-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-2615</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 14:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=4456#comment-2615</guid>
		<description>Yes, the general assumption seems to be that the interviewer is smarter and more knowledgeable than you and is someone you should &#039;get along with&#039;.

If I was hiring, I would only want to hire people smarter and more intelligent than me (read: better qualified to do the job I&#039;m hiring them to do than I am)—although I&#039;m unsure if they would want to work for me in that situation.  Incidentally, these are the types of people I prefer to spend my time with.

Would you not also be hugely suspicious of a person who doesn&#039;t say &quot;I don&#039;t know&quot; or &quot;I don&#039;t understand&quot;? With &#039;standard&#039; interview questions these phrases shouldn&#039;t be uttered by the intelligent/competent, but during an in-depth and searching discussion on varied topics, I would likely call them mandatory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, the general assumption seems to be that the interviewer is smarter and more knowledgeable than you and is someone you should ‘get along with’.</p>
<p>If I was hiring, I would only want to hire people smarter and more intelligent than me (read: better qualified to do the job I’m hiring them to do than I am)—although I’m unsure if they would want to work for me in that situation.  Incidentally, these are the types of people I prefer to spend my time with.</p>
<p>Would you not also be hugely suspicious of a person who doesn’t say “I don’t know” or “I don’t understand”? With ‘standard’ interview questions these phrases shouldn’t be uttered by the intelligent/competent, but during an in-depth and searching discussion on varied topics, I would likely call them mandatory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/12/31/on-hiring-talent-not-just-programmers/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=4456#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>There is an assumption in the method used to screen candidates that the interviewer is smarter than the interviewee of course (otherwise you will only that they are at least as smart as you). Also, perhaps the fact (I choose that word carefully here) that the majority of us are bad judges of character applies here.

Unless, by &#039;hanging out with them for a bit&#039;, Swartz is trying to say &lt;i&gt;&#039;I only hire my friends&#039;&lt;/i&gt; in which case ... well I&#039;m not sure what to make of that.

Personally I judge a person&#039;s smartness by first asking them to tell me about the stuff they do and telling them &quot;I don&#039;t understand&quot; to see how well they can explain it. Many people are good at what they do but can&#039;t apply it in the context they need to. Its no good designing a time machine if you can&#039;t explain how to build it.

Then, I find the point at which they say &quot;I don&#039;t know&quot; or &quot;I don&#039;t understand&quot;. If they never say either of those phrases, there&#039;s a small chance they&#039;re wildly smarter than anyone I know or a good chance they&#039;re just bluffing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an assumption in the method used to screen candidates that the interviewer is smarter than the interviewee of course (otherwise you will only that they are at least as smart as you). Also, perhaps the fact (I choose that word carefully here) that the majority of us are bad judges of character applies here.</p>
<p>Unless, by ‘hanging out with them for a bit’, Swartz is trying to say <i>‘I only hire my friends’</i> in which case … well I’m not sure what to make of that.</p>
<p>Personally I judge a person’s smartness by first asking them to tell me about the stuff they do and telling them “I don’t understand” to see how well they can explain it. Many people are good at what they do but can’t apply it in the context they need to. Its no good designing a time machine if you can’t explain how to build it.</p>
<p>Then, I find the point at which they say “I don’t know” or “I don’t understand”. If they never say either of those phrases, there’s a small chance they’re wildly smarter than anyone I know or a good chance they’re just bluffing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

