Stuck in an express ele­va­tor around the 13th floor of the McGraw-Hill office in New York for 41 hours, Nicholas White’s story should be some­what fear-provoking.

Inter­sperse with infor­ma­tion on the impor­tance of ele­va­tors in mod­ern cities, a pro­file of ele­va­tor con­sul­tant James For­tune and a dis­cus­sion on the psy­chol­ogy of ele­va­tors, the arti­cle some­how becomes reas­sur­ing instead.

Two things make tall build­ings pos­si­ble: the steel frame and the safety ele­va­tor. The ele­va­tor […] is to the city what paper is to read­ing and gun­pow­der is to war. With­out the ele­va­tor, there would be no ver­ti­cal­ity, no den­sity, and, with­out these, none of the urban advan­tages of energy effi­ciency, eco­nomic pro­duc­tiv­ity, and cul­tural fer­ment. […] And the ele­va­tor is energy-efficient—the coun­ter­weight does a great deal of the work, and the new sys­tems these days regen­er­ate elec­tric­ity. The ele­va­tor is a hybrid, by design.

This quote from a spokesman for ele­va­tor com­pany Otis:

We’ll wait ten to fif­teen min­utes for a train, with­out com­plain­ing, […] but wait thirty sec­onds for an ele­va­tor and the world’s com­ing to an end. Which means, really, that we’ve done a good job. We deliver short waits. But why are we held to a dif­fer­ent standard?

and the var­i­ous dis­cus­sions on the psy­chol­ogy of ele­va­tor spac­ing brings to mind this quote from Re-creating the Cor­po­ra­tion by the recently deceased organ­i­sa­tional the­o­rist, Rus­sell Ack­off:

There is a clas­sic case in which the ten­ants of a large office build­ing com­plained about the increas­ingly poor ele­va­tor ser­vice. A con­sult­ing firm spe­cial­iz­ing in elevator-related prob­lems was employed to deal with the sit­u­a­tion. It first estab­lished that aver­age wait­ing time for ele­va­tors was too long. It then eval­u­ated the pos­si­bil­i­ties of adding ele­va­tors, replac­ing exist­ing ele­va­tors with faster ones, and intro­duc­ing com­puter con­trols to improve uti­liza­tion of ele­va­tors. For var­i­ous rea­sons, none of these turned out to be sat­is­fac­tory. The engi­neers declared the prob­lem to be unsolvable.

When exposed to the prob­lem, a young psy­chol­o­gist employed in the building’s per­son­nel depart­ment made a sim­ple sug­ges­tion that dis­solved the prob­lem. Unlike the engi­neers who saw the ser­vice as too slow, he saw the prob­lem as one deriv­ing from the bore­dom of those wait­ing for an ele­va­tor. So he decided they should be given some­thing to do. He sug­gested putting mir­rors in the ele­va­tor lob­bies to occupy those wait­ing by enabling them to look at them­selves and oth­ers with­out appear­ing to do so. The mir­rors were put up and com­plaints stopped. In fact, some of the pre­vi­ously com­plain­ing ten­ants con­grat­u­lated man­age­ment on improve­ment of the ele­va­tor service.

via Kot­tke