Concerning politics, wow! The vast majority of politicos will and have used such principles as a path to power, albeit, not always knowingly. It does not matter what party, principles, or beliefs they supposedly espouse. “Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely” (Lord Acton and William Pitt the Elder). There is really no way to avoid if history lessons are to be heeded.

This begs the further question of POWER. IF most of us by adulthood are engaged knowingly or unknowingly in power relations with each other then the seven principles mentioned are part of that set of relations. Will not matter what ‘side’ or beliefs you claim to ally with or hate.

Gaius (Caligula) Caesar from 2,000 years ago had a saying “Oderint dum metuant”, roughly translated as “let them hate (me) so long as they also fear (me).” Roman emperors had absolute power, at least until they ticked off someone too much! He was assassinated by a Praetorian guard he had insulted.

Today, some rulers such as presidents past and present, cant use Caligula’s practices as much as they would like but the corruption of power leads them toward use the principles mentioned above…

In other words you will find the same practices employed by Obama, the Bush or Clinton families, etc. There is little difference from a historical perspective and arguments generally turn into a matter of ‘degreee’ concerning such behaviors by leadership. This is especially true when leading a former superpower such as the U.S. with 300 million people.

Distraction-Questions about the 20 years of his life pre-book, from college to office.…“refer to his books.” Oh, and you probably are racist anyway i.e., Clinton is racist, that’s what he really meant by mentioning Jesse Jackson in S.C. , or Hilary mentioning RFK’s death means she wants him dead, or…take your pick. Just don’t ask any logical, normal background, experience questions. Thank you.

You can keep your press pass. You’re welcome.

Herd– Kool Aid. Fresh. Ice cold. Super sweet. How could you not like it? Are you so racist that you don’t like it?

Deception– FISA, NAFTA-‘Clinton did it!!! Oh, there’s a note that says I did it and not her? Well, it doesn’t really say what it really says, just ask the media.’ Iraq war vote and supporting re-created ‘anti-Iraq war speech’ that was recorded by absolutely no one in existence the first time around. Public campaign finance-destroyed since Mickey Mouse and his friend Donald can give money unfettered there’s no need to make sure the money comes from real people. Public option just like the Fed Health care plan…‘you believed that too didn’t you?’. Bank bailout, habeus corpus, etc. “Of course I’ll do it because I’m all for it. Believe me, I am. I’ll just be doing things that accomplish the opposite. Seriously.”

Need and Greed– You get the chance to think of yourself as being a great/good/ progressive/not bad person because you didn’t deny yourself the opportunity to vote for the half-white guy that you knew less about rather thatn the other full-white people that you could have voted for. You are so cool and with it.

Time– Iraq War, Afghanistan War, the economy, healthcare, social security…‘they’re all broken so hurry up and make your decision to vote for me so I can fix everything. Don’t ask me for details on my plans, just trust me…hurry up and make up your mind to vote for me. Did I already say that?’

I think there is also one other principle missing and that is the strong desire and effort by marks to deny and deny and deny that they have been had. This gives the con-ner more space to get away with it with other folks.

Mike, I’m not quite sure this is how Obama and his administration use psychological principals to influence and ‘nudge’ the electorate at all.

Can you provide an example of where they have used a number of these? (The use of one of these principles barely counts as a ‘con’, in my opinion.

Rather, Obama and his administration use methods to influence that would more accurately come under the branch of ‘behavioural economics’ or ‘behavioural psychology’. For more on this I suggest perusing my previous post, Behavioural Economics and Financial Policies.

Thanks for your comment.

And have the gall to stand on the same platform of Hope & Change!

–Mike