<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 50th Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/11/17/the-50th-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/11/17/the-50th-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/11/17/the-50th-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2501</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=4167#comment-2501</guid>
		<description>Exactly my thoughts when I heard Eliezer Yudkowsky and Robert Greene were going to have a filmed discussion.  What an unexpected pairing!

Since watching it for the first time I haven&#039;t been able to load the BHTV discussion, and wanted to do so to answer your question;, on who came &quot;out on top in the transhumanist part of the debate&quot;.

Thinking back, however, I recall being of the opinion that Greene, while interested in the topic, was dealing with it almost as a novelty while Yodkowsky truly believes in the &#039;triumph&#039; of transhumanism.

From this I felt that Greene approached this section of the debate quite openly, evenly and, dare I say, rationally, while Yudkowsky&#039;s thoughts felt tainted by his belief.  You could say each of his thoughts were a product of the confirmation bias.

I wouldn&#039;t mind hearing your (or anyone&#039;s) views on this?  Hope you check back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly my thoughts when I heard Eliezer Yudkowsky and Robert Greene were going to have a filmed discussion.  What an unexpected pairing!</p>
<p>Since watching it for the first time I haven’t been able to load the BHTV discussion, and wanted to do so to answer your question;, on who came “out on top in the transhumanist part of the debate”.</p>
<p>Thinking back, however, I recall being of the opinion that Greene, while interested in the topic, was dealing with it almost as a novelty while Yodkowsky truly believes in the ‘triumph’ of transhumanism.</p>
<p>From this I felt that Greene approached this section of the debate quite openly, evenly and, dare I say, rationally, while Yudkowsky’s thoughts felt tainted by his belief.  You could say each of his thoughts were a product of the confirmation bias.</p>
<p>I wouldn’t mind hearing your (or anyone’s) views on this?  Hope you check back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/11/17/the-50th-law/comment-page-1/#comment-2482</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=4167#comment-2482</guid>
		<description>Robert Greene and Eliezer? Never in a million years... Who do you feel like came out on top in the transhumanist part of the debate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Greene and Eliezer? Never in a million years… Who do you feel like came out on top in the transhumanist part of the debate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

