Are poor cyclists and a laissez-faire atti­tude to enforc­ing road laws on them the key to safer roads? Are those that cycle on the wrong side of the road, pedal on the pave­ment and rush along one-way streets the wrong way one of the main rea­sons why the Nether­lands has some of the safest roads in the world?

After writer Caleb Crain con­verted from way­ward biker to obe­di­ent cyclist (using two sim­ple rules: Bike in such a way that even rel­a­tively inat­ten­tive dri­vers can be expected to see you and know what you’re going to do next, and Don’t be annoy­ing to pedes­tri­ans) he read the fol­low­ing that made him ques­tion his new-found indig­na­tion toward bike salmon:

I was there­fore inter­ested, and a lit­tle chas­tened, to read in Jeff Mapes’s Ped­al­ing Rev­o­lu­tion: How Cyclists Are Chang­ing Amer­i­can Cities, that moral indig­na­tion about the adher­ence of bicy­clists to traf­fic laws is absent from the Nether­lands, the utopia of cycling, which has, Mapes reports, “the low­est per-capita vehi­cle death rate in Europe,” about a third that of the United States. Except for the require­ment that bicy­cles on the road at night have lights, Dutch police do not enforce traf­fic laws on cyclists. Explains Mapes:

The Dutch don’t see much sense in going after cyclists and walk­ers when the only peo­ple they are putting at risk are them­selves. “It’s their choice,” shrugged [Ams­ter­dam top traffic-safety offi­cial Jack] Wolters. … The sta­tis­tics seem to bear him out. … One influ­en­tial 2003 study, by researchers John Pucher and Lewis Dijk­stra, found Amer­i­can cyclists were at least three times as likely to get killed as Dutch cyclists, while Amer­i­can pedes­tri­ans faced at least six times the dan­ger of dying.