<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good Employees and Successful Entrepreneurs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/04/08/good-employees-and-successful-entrepreneurs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/04/08/good-employees-and-successful-entrepreneurs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/04/08/good-employees-and-successful-entrepreneurs/comment-page-1/#comment-1451</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=2603#comment-1451</guid>
		<description>The problem I think is that entrepreneurial characteristics are rarely valued, or worse are derided in many organizations. 

&quot;Resilience&quot; is a fairly meaningless term, but &quot;curiosity, agility resourcefulness, pattern recognition and tenacity&quot; will more likely be punished than rewarded in for example, a typical technology company.

To put it another way, in the eyes of a hiring manager (maybe like Marissa):

Curiosity = Nosey
Agility = Flighty
Resourceful = Mean
Pattern Recongition = Conspiracist
Tenacity = Pushy

Now entrepreneurs need to know how to break rules and genuinely &quot;think outside the box&quot;, which is why a nosey, flighty, mean, pushy conspiracist will do fine as an entrepreneur, but not even get the time of day at many tech companies, including - it appears, Google.

In this respect, Marissa is actually bodyshopping for robots, not entrepreneurs, which is increasing evidence that Google has actually turned into Just Another Tech Company. 

I imagine they&#039;ll need a &quot;We Think Outside The Box - Honestly&quot; banner on their recruitment site soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem I think is that entrepreneurial characteristics are rarely valued, or worse are derided in many organizations. </p>
<p>“Resilience” is a fairly meaningless term, but “curiosity, agility resourcefulness, pattern recognition and tenacity” will more likely be punished than rewarded in for example, a typical technology company.</p>
<p>To put it another way, in the eyes of a hiring manager (maybe like Marissa):</p>
<p>Curiosity = Nosey<br />
Agility = Flighty<br />
Resourceful = Mean<br />
Pattern Recongition = Conspiracist<br />
Tenacity = Pushy</p>
<p>Now entrepreneurs need to know how to break rules and genuinely “think outside the box”, which is why a nosey, flighty, mean, pushy conspiracist will do fine as an entrepreneur, but not even get the time of day at many tech companies, including — it appears, Google.</p>
<p>In this respect, Marissa is actually bodyshopping for robots, not entrepreneurs, which is increasing evidence that Google has actually turned into Just Another Tech Company. </p>
<p>I imagine they’ll need a “We Think Outside The Box — Honestly” banner on their recruitment site soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

