<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Writing ‘On Writing Well’</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/03/31/writing-on-writing-well/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/03/31/writing-on-writing-well/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/03/31/writing-on-writing-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=2521#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Andy — yes!

I particularly liked this quote from &lt;a title=&quot;William Zinsser - Wikipedia&quot; href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Zinsser&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Zinsser&#039;s Wikipedia entry&lt;/a&gt;:
&lt;blockquote&gt;In his books, Zinsser emphasizes word economy. Author James J. Kilpatrick, in his book &lt;em&gt;The Writer&#039;s Art&lt;/em&gt; says that if he were limited to just one book on how to write, it would be William Zinsser&#039;s &lt;em&gt;On Writing Well&lt;/em&gt;. Adds Kilpatrick, &quot;Zinsser&#039;s sound theory is that &#039;writing improves in direct ratio to the number of things we can keep out of it.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
On a similar note, in a tongue-in-cheek April Fools&#039; Day article from &lt;em&gt;The Guardian&lt;/em&gt; (&lt;a title=&quot;Twitter Switch for Guardian, After 188 Years of Ink - The Guardian&quot; href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/01/guardian-twitter-media-technology&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;on how the paper is switching exclusively to Twitter &quot;after 188 years of ink&quot;&lt;/a&gt;) there&#039;s the quote: &quot;Experts say any story can be told in 140 characters&quot;. A more extreme version of the same premise that made me chuckle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy — yes!</p>
<p>I particularly liked this quote from <a title="William Zinsser - Wikipedia" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Zinsser" rel="nofollow">Zinsser’s Wikipedia entry</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>In his books, Zinsser emphasizes word economy. Author James J. Kilpatrick, in his book <em>The Writer’s Art</em> says that if he were limited to just one book on how to write, it would be William Zinsser’s <em>On Writing Well</em>. Adds Kilpatrick, “Zinsser’s sound theory is that ‘writing improves in direct ratio to the number of things we can keep out of it.”</p></blockquote>
<p>On a similar note, in a tongue-in-cheek April Fools’ Day article from <em>The Guardian</em> (<a title="Twitter Switch for Guardian, After 188 Years of Ink - The Guardian" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/apr/01/guardian-twitter-media-technology" rel="nofollow">on how the paper is switching exclusively to Twitter “after 188 years of ink”</a>) there’s the quote: “Experts say any story can be told in 140 characters”. A more extreme version of the same premise that made me chuckle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halvard Halvorsen&#8217;s tumblelog &#187; Visions and Revisions: an article by William Zinsser about writing and keeping up to date his book, On Writing Well &#124; The American Scholar</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/03/31/writing-on-writing-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1368</link>
		<dc:creator>Halvard Halvorsen&#8217;s tumblelog &#187; Visions and Revisions: an article by William Zinsser about writing and keeping up to date his book, On Writing Well &#124; The American Scholar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=2521#comment-1368</guid>
		<description>[...] Lone Gunman. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] Lone Gunman. […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/03/31/writing-on-writing-well/comment-page-1/#comment-1364</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=2521#comment-1364</guid>
		<description>What an interesting article. Lots of succinct gems.

&quot;As an editor I knew that almost anything can be cut to 300 words;&quot;

- How true!

Thanks,
Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an interesting article. Lots of succinct gems.</p>
<p>“As an editor I knew that almost anything can be cut to 300 words;”</p>
<p>- How true!</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

