<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better Communication</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/01/23/better-communication/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/01/23/better-communication/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:29:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/01/23/better-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1176</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=1555#comment-1176</guid>
		<description>Hi there (Anon),

Thanks for the comment, although I feel I must disagree:

Apart from your gross generalisation about the typical U.S. citizen&#039;s attention span, I think you&#039;re quite correct—although missing the point.

Everywhere we go (regardless of international borders) your point holds true: the first 30 seconds to a minute are introductory, &lt;em&gt;depending on the context&lt;/em&gt;… and &lt;em&gt;in the context that this advice is supposed to be taken&lt;/em&gt; I feel that the &#039;Traffic Light Rule&#039; is wholly valid.

Of course, the trick is not to take this advice too literally—nobody should time themselves talking—but instead simply be aware of time passing while engaging in a &lt;em&gt;two-way&lt;/em&gt; discussion.

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there (Anon),</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, although I feel I must disagree:</p>
<p>Apart from your gross generalisation about the typical U.S. citizen’s attention span, I think you’re quite correct—although missing the point.</p>
<p>Everywhere we go (regardless of international borders) your point holds true: the first 30 seconds to a minute are introductory, <em>depending on the context</em>… and <em>in the context that this advice is supposed to be taken</em> I feel that the ‘Traffic Light Rule’ is wholly valid.</p>
<p>Of course, the trick is not to take this advice too literally—nobody should time themselves talking—but instead simply be aware of time passing while engaging in a <em>two-way</em> discussion.</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/01/23/better-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1174</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=1555#comment-1174</guid>
		<description>This is based on the attention span typical in the USA. It would be quite different in other countries. In some cultures the first 30 sec is expected to be the &quot;introduction&quot;, the &quot;setting of the scene&quot; for any statement by a reasonably sophisticated person and hence not the &quot;prime time&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is based on the attention span typical in the USA. It would be quite different in other countries. In some cultures the first 30 sec is expected to be the “introduction”, the “setting of the scene” for any statement by a reasonably sophisticated person and hence not the “prime time”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Morgan</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/01/23/better-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Morgan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=1555#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>Pauly,

May I ask if it took you longer than one minute to read this?

Anyway, thanks for the constructive comment; please feel free to offer your analysis on some of my other posts.

Only joking, of course! Thanks for the lovely comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pauly,</p>
<p>May I ask if it took you longer than one minute to read this?</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for the constructive comment; please feel free to offer your analysis on some of my other posts.</p>
<p>Only joking, of course! Thanks for the lovely comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pauly S</title>
		<link>http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/2009/01/23/better-communication/comment-page-1/#comment-1173</link>
		<dc:creator>Pauly S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lonegunman.co.uk/?p=1555#comment-1173</guid>
		<description>Boring!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boring!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

