Not­ing that knowl­edge is grow­ing at an expo­nen­tial rate, Kevin Kelly argues that thanks to sci­ence, our igno­rance is grow­ing expo­nen­tially faster.

If knowl­edge is grow­ing expo­nen­tially we should be quickly run­ning out of puz­zles. Because of our accel­er­at­ing rate of learn­ing, a few writ­ers declared we must be in the age of “the end of science.”

Yet the para­dox of sci­ence is that every answer breeds at least two new ques­tions. More answers, more ques­tions. Tele­scopes and micro­scopes expanded not only what we knew, but what we didn’t know. They allowed us to spy into our igno­rance. New and bet­ter tools per­mit us new and bet­ter questions.

Thus even though our knowl­edge is expand­ing expo­nen­tially, our ques­tions are expand­ing expo­nen­tially faster. And as math­e­mati­cians will tell you, the widen­ing gap between two expo­nen­tial curves is itself an expo­nen­tial curve. That gap between ques­tions and answers is our igno­rance […] in other words, sci­ence is a method that chiefly expands our igno­rance rather than our knowledge.

via Seed